<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More solar energy than we know what to do with</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greengeek.ca/more-solar-energy-than-we-know-what-to-do-with/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greengeek.ca/more-solar-energy-than-we-know-what-to-do-with/</link>
	<description>Ideas for a Greener Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:18:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Green Geek &#187; Study Says: For Cheap Clean Energy, Go Geothermal</title>
		<link>http://www.greengeek.ca/more-solar-energy-than-we-know-what-to-do-with/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>The Green Geek &#187; Study Says: For Cheap Clean Energy, Go Geothermal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greengeek.ca/2006/07/25/more-solar-energy-than-we-know-what-to-do-with/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] clean energy technologies by environmental impact, with wind power coming out on top, followed by solar thermal technology; geothermal came in third [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clean energy technologies by environmental impact, with wind power coming out on top, followed by solar thermal technology; geothermal came in third [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
